|Our founding fathers fought a war for a different kind of country: with
Liberty for All:|
|The government was to be the servant of
the people, not their master.
Common law was comprised of criminal and equity law, not "statutory law".
The purpose of the Law was to protect rights and property, not to regulate!
People only went to court if there was an injured party, not for statute violations.
But Big Brother changed things: "statutory law" was created to try to regulate us.
The constitution didn't allow laws like "statutory laws" to "regulate" Citizens,
A "Corporate U.S." was created to bypass Constitutional Limits
=>>so the bureaucrats had to figure out a way to fool us into submission.
First, they created Washington D.C., a federal enclave outside of any state's jurisdiction.
Congress could then make special "local" laws that applied only to federal enclaves.
(They applied to denizens of Wash D.C. and the territories, not to the Citizens within the States)
To circumvent these limits, they made the new "local gov't" in Washington a Corporation.
The federal gov't has no Constitutional jurisdiction within state boundaries. |
(Federal Constitutional jurisdiction is only INTERstate and outside of states)
They called the new Corporation ""United States" for ambiguity to fool the American people.
Citizens are not subject to this local gov't called the "U.S."(just as they are not subject to
jurisdiction of the united States of America while living within state boundaries.)
But the "U.S. Inc." local gov Corporation fooled Citizens into obeying it with its name "U.S.",
As a Corporation, it can act outside of Constitutional boundaries, because it can now be sued
(Constitutional government set up under the Constitution could not be sued)
The Supreme Court has ruled laws that apply only to federal enclaves are constitutional
But the laws do not constitutionally apply to Citizens in the individual States !!!!
You have to know your rights and fight for them - Big Brother wants to take them away.
An unconstitutional Central Bank called the Federal Reserve ("the FED") was set up
The Constitution prohibits a Central Bank - only the Treasury is Constitutional!
(this private Corporation, owned by the Rothschilds &. Rockefellers thru 9 owner banks,
was formed thru "U.S. Inc." by a Congress with no quorum)
The FED has milked the USA of its Capital with $600 billion/yr in interest on an illegal debt.
The IRS is a Direct Tax that applies only to denizens of federal enclaves
The Consititution Prohibits Direct Taxes without apportionment
(because they are subject to the new "U.S. Inc.")
Then the Victory Tax Act of 1942 pleaded with Citizens to be super-patriotic and said:
"Please get a Social Security number to be able to pay IRS taxes to win WWII".
People didn't realize it took "purse string" control away
from the States & thus was unpatriotic!
The IRS was a temporary tax to expire after the end of WWII (ha ha?).
$600 billion in taxes pay just the interest payments to the FED (to the
Now, people accept the IRS, SS#s, the FED, & federal jurisdiction?
and Rockefellers) every year, sucking the blood (capital) from our country.
The judges have been fooled too, so they often make rulings by what they
believe, rather than reading the fine points of law presented with proof of original intent of the founding fathers.
The courts are supposed to provide "checks and balances" against
unconstitutional actions by the other 2 branches, but they have refused to
do their duty! For example, the 14th and 16th Amendments were not properly
ratified, but the Secretary of State validated them, and the Supreme Court
has ruled that it won't question his validation.
now we have NO CAPITAL LEFT! => a Depression. We were all fooled!
Judges that have forgotten the laws of our founding fathers would benefit from a criminal justice degree online refresher course. The Freemen and Patriots get rightfully upset, but no one should directly threaten even an ignorant judge with violence, but rather with judicial complaints and Title 42 lawsuits. Instead of violence, you have to learn your rights and legal tools you can use (like proper legal reponses, Administrative Remedy, lawsuits, (liens?), etc) that you can use to protect yourself from gov't abuses.
Statutes are not constitutionally applicable to Citizens of individual states.
So they tried to make everyone believe that "U.S. citizenship is a privilege"
granted by U.S. Inc. thru the 14th Amendment).
State Citizens have automatically all the rights of Citizens of the US, but are not subject to US Jurisdiction. The States were the Nations, but US was only a federation of those Nation States.
Sovereign State Citizenship is a RIGHT, not a privilege!
The 14th Amendment only gave the privilege of Citizenship to ex-slaves and immigrants and gave nothing new to Natural-Born Sovereign Citizens.
This distinction of 2 types of Citizenship, upheld by the Supreme Court, is often cited to label Patriots as racial bigots, even tho that's the law!
U.S. Citizenship was not a new privilege granted by the 14th Amendment
They have used Executive Orders to get Emergency War Powers since 1933 (& 1917).
These Emergency War Powers allow unlimited power to the Executive Branch.
They are supposed to be granted only in time of war or rebellion.
In 1933, the only problem was the run on the Federal Reserve.
They suspended the Constitution by Executive Order in 1933.
The War Powers are supposed to be revoked at the end of the war!!
Instead, they keep declaring new wars: (besides those in Korea & Vietnam)
We have the War on Drugs with a Drug "Czar?", the war on crime, etc.
It was to suspend the Gold Standard, so the FED could keep the gold.
1/4 of one salary of one working father paid the mortgage before.
Our standard of living is lower than our parents':
Now both parents have to work (a perversion of "Women's Lib?").
And we are taxed about 70% of our earnings (Fed,state,DMV,property,sales taxes + local fees and hidden taxes)
Have we lost our rights as Sovereign Citizens or is there hope?
Government has truly run amok!!!
Read the info below and decide for yourself: |
(& fight Gov't with Administrative Remedy, as taught by Ed Kahn & Dan Tankersly)
(don't wait until they pull you into court, but also study the law to fight them there)
Topics:Latest, News, Documents, State Citizenship, Sovereign Citizenship, Militia, General Patriot, FIJA, Taxes, John Birch, Libertarians, Candidates, Economics, Misc,
Sites with Patriotic Information
Latest Events / additions:
3)breaks away from the Union legally, and with Texas Militia backing!
- Great Press summary of basis for Republic of Texas(copy)
- Nation of Hawai'i(Hawaiian Secession from Union?)
Essential Sovereign Internet Resouces:
3. adventuresinlegalland.com [Gone?]
13.Sovereigns Not Required to Have Drivers License libertyforum.org/ [gone?]
Essential Audio and Video Resources :
1. The Money Masters- themoneymasters.com
2. Waco Rules of Engagement- waco93.com
3. Alex Jones Videos- infowars.com
- New Documents: Magna Carta, Charters, Tax Debates, Decl. of Indep., Constitution
- Magna Carta
- John Locke: An Essay concerning the true original, extent and end of civil Government (1690)
- John Locke (ibid): Chapter 5: On Property
"26. Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a "property" in his own "person." This nobody has any right to but himself. The "labour" of his body and the "work" of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever, then, he removes out of the state that Nature hath provided and left it in, he hath mixed his labour with it, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It being by him removed from the common state Nature placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other men. For this "labour" being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others."
- The Federalist Papers
- The Constitutional Convention debates and the Anti-Federalist Papers
- Madison speech proposing the Bill of Rights June 8 1789
There have been objections of various kinds made against the constitution: ... because it grants more power than is supposed to be necessary for every good purpose; ... I believe that the great mass of the people who opposed it, disliked it because it did not contain effectual provison against encroachments on particular rights, and those safeguards which they have been long accustomed to have interposed between them and the magistrate who exercised the sovereign power
*** THE BEST ONLINE LIB: Amer Law Src Online (ALSO)